CBP corrects Section 338 filing guidance; Vietnam OCTG deposits change

CBP corrected the Section 338 exemption number in its ACE error guidance on September 17. Commerce also set a new 15.52% antidumping deposit for SeAH Steel VINA’s covered Vietnamese oil country tubular goods. CSMS #69941677 Vietnam OCTG final review

Freight trucks passing through illuminated customs inspection lanes at a border terminal after sunset.
CBP Corrects Section 338 Filing
The September 17 correction clarifies the Chapter 99 number associated with ACE error F884.

F884 now correctly identifies 9903.03.15

Issued at 11:20 a.m. EDT on September 17, CSMS #69941677 corrects #69915227. Error F884 concerns exemption HTS 9903.03.15: it is rejected when the entry-summary line lacks the appropriate dutiable Chapter 99 number. The validation was deployed in CERT and PROD on August 26; September 17 corrects the published explanation. CSMS #69941677

SeAH Steel VINA’s OCTG deposit becomes 15.52%

Commerce’s final 2023–2024 administrative review of oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Vietnam assigns SeAH Steel VINA Corporation a 15.52% AD margin and cash-deposit rate. The deposit requirement applies to covered entries, or withdrawals from warehouse for consumption, on or after September 17, 2026. OCTG refers to pipe used in oil and gas wells. Vietnam OCTG final review

The notice retains the separate 111.47% Vietnam-wide rate for exporters that do not qualify for a separate rate. Previously reviewed exporters not covered by this final result follow the notice’s existing-rate instructions. Supplier identity therefore matters: 15.52% is not a new rate for every Vietnamese pipe shipment. Vietnam OCTG final review

For the 2023–2024 review period, Commerce will issue separate assessment instructions, including importer-specific calculations where required. Entry teams should update the current supplier deposit record without using it as a substitute for the historical assessment calculation. Vietnam OCTG final review

OFAC adds Iran and Cuba targets, removes two Belarus entities

OFAC’s September 17 update adds six individuals and ten entities. Iran-related targets include BitBank, also known as BitBank3, Pishtaz Simorgh Electronic Trade Company and three individuals. The Cuba additions cover three individuals and eight entities, including military research bodies and nickel-sector businesses. OFAC September 17 list changes

Treasury says the Iran action targets a digital-asset exchange and its supporting network. U.S.-jurisdiction property must be blocked, and the ownership rule also reaches entities owned 50% or more, directly or indirectly and in aggregate, by blocked persons. Refresh payment-intermediary and ownership screening alongside supplier screening. Treasury BitBank action

The same list update removes Lakokraska OAO and Kontsern Bellesbumprom from the Belarus-related SDN listings. Check aliases when resolving an existing match; delisting those entities does not remove restrictions that may apply through other parties or authorities. OFAC September 17 list changes

BIS publishes three airline denial renewals

Three temporary denial orders for Azur Air, PJSC Aeroflot and UTair Aviation JSC were published September 17. Each order was issued and effective September 11, 2026, for one year. These are renewals of export-privilege denials under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), not a tariff measure on aircraft. Azur Air denial renewal Aeroflot denial renewal UTair denial renewal

The orders restrict the airlines’ participation in covered EAR transactions and prohibit specified assistance by other persons. Parts suppliers, forwarders and maintenance providers should review the order’s transaction prohibitions before supplying, arranging or servicing EAR-controlled items. The text includes a safety-of-flight qualification; it should not be read as a general maintenance authorization. Aeroflot denial renewal

Balloon dilation devices: review and remedy submissions

In 337-TA-1449, USITC will review parts of an administrative law judge’s final initial determination finding a Section 337 violation involving balloon dilation devices. The case involves Entellus/Stryker and Fiagon-related respondents. The September 17 notice requests submissions on specified review questions, possible remedies, public interest and bonding. Balloon dilation devices Commission review

Initial submissions are due September 28, replies October 5, and the target date moves to November 13, 2026. The recommended exclusion and cease-and-desist relief has not become a Commission order through this notice. Medical-device importers should identify affected models and suppliers while following the Commission’s next determination. Balloon dilation devices Commission review

Actions for entry and compliance teams

Next: the concrete filing deadlines in the balloon-device case are September 28 and October 5. Monitor the resulting Commission decision and any actual remedial order before assigning an exclusion-order consequence to a shipment. Balloon dilation devices Commission review

Frequently asked questions

Did CBP introduce a new Section 338 duty on September 17?

No. The notice corrects the tariff number in an error explanation and identifies an August 26 system deployment. It does not announce a new duty rate. CSMS #69941677

Does the 15.52% OCTG rate apply to all Vietnamese producers?

No. It is SeAH Steel VINA’s final-review deposit rate. The notice separately preserves the Vietnam-wide rate and specifies treatment for other exporters. Vietnam OCTG final review

Why screen ownership as well as the listed company name?

A company need not appear by name on the SDN List to be blocked when blocked persons own 50% or more of it in aggregate. Treasury reiterates that consequence in its September 17 action. Treasury BitBank action

Do the airline orders start on their Federal Register publication date?

The three renewals state that they are effective September 11 for one year. September 17 is their Federal Register publication date; treating that later date as the start would miss part of the effective period. Azur Air denial renewal Aeroflot denial renewal UTair denial renewal

Has USITC already excluded the balloon devices?

This notice opens Commission review and requests remedy submissions. A recommended exclusion order in the judge’s decision is not an issued Commission exclusion order. Balloon dilation devices Commission review

Official sources and publication dates